University Students’ Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Work: Efficiency, Learning Quality, and Academic Integrity
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Generative AI, University students, Academic integrityAbstract
Integrasi cepat artificial intelligence (AI), terutama AI generatif, telah mengubah praktik akademik di pendidikan tinggi dan memunculkan kekhawatiran tentang kualitas pembelajaran, upaya akademik, dan integritas. Meskipun AI menawarkan efisiensi, implikasinya terhadap keterlibatan belajar dan perilaku etis masih diperdebatkan. Penelitian ini mengkaji pola penggunaan AI oleh mahasiswa, orientasi terhadap efisiensi dan kualitas belajar, persepsi mengenai upaya akademik, pertimbangan etis, serta sikap terhadap regulasi institusional. Menggunakan survei kuantitatif potong lintang, data dikumpulkan dari 316 mahasiswa sarjana dari berbagai universitas dan program studi. Data diperoleh melalui kuesioner daring dengan 10 butir skala Likert dan dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan korelasional. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan AI hampir universal, menandakan normalisasi AI sebagai sumber akademik. Penggunaan berorientasi efisiensi lebih dominan dibanding penggunaan berorientasi pembelajaran. Mahasiswa mengakui bahwa penggunaan AI dapat menurunkan upaya akademik, menciptakan ketegangan antara efisiensi dan keterlibatan belajar yang bermakna. Kekhawatiran etis teridentifikasi dan persepsi potensi penyalahgunaan terlihat. Mahasiswa juga menunjukkan keterbukaan terhadap regulasi institusional dan penilaian yang melek-AI, mencerminkan sikap siap-regulasi dibanding penolakan. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya desain kebijakan dan pedagogi yang menyeimbangkan efisiensi, kualitas belajar, dan integritas akademik dalam integrasi AI.
References
British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
Bretag, T. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of academic integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book255675
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on generative AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13, 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators.
https://education.ec.europa.eu/document/ethical-guidelines-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-and-data-in-teaching-and-learning-for-educators
Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30, 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? Opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kohnke, L., Zou, D., & Zhang, R. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and language education: ChatGPT and beyond. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: The end of traditional assessments? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dedi Irwan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Tutwurihandayani Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher Lembaga Riset Ilmiah
© 2023

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Dedi Irwan, Why Cafés Matter: Rethinking Formal Learning Spaces in Indonesian Higher Education , Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan: Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025
