Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi Dimensi Fraud Triangle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59086/jam.v2i3.381Keywords:
Kecuranga Akademik, Mahasiswa Akuntansi, Fraud Triangle TheoryAbstract
Kecurangan akademik merupakan tindakan yang melanggar etika dan integritas dalam dunia pendidikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi penyebab perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa akuntansi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel di suatu perguruan tinggi di Kota Surabaya. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan dengan observasi dan wawancara kepada 4 responden mahasiswa Akuntansi. Berdasarkan hasil dari penelitian dapat disimpulkan tindakan kecurangan akademik mahasiswa disebabkan oleh empat aspek utama yaitu tekanan, peluang, dan rasionalisasi. Seorang mahasiswa tidak melakukan tindak kecurangan akademik apabilai salah satu aspek tidak terpenuhi. Banyaknya kecurangan yang terjadi perlu segera diatasi atau dicegah.
Academic cheating is an act that violates ethics and integrity in the world of education. This research aims to identify the causes of academic cheating behavior of accounting students at Sunan Ampel State Islamic University at a university in the city of Surabaya. This type of research is qualitative research. Data was collected by observation and interviews with 4 Accounting student respondents. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that students' academic cheating is caused by four main aspects, namely pressure, opportunity and rationalization. A student does not commit academic fraud if one aspect is not met. The large number of frauds that occur need to be addressed or prevented immediately
Downloads
References
Agud, J.L. “Fraud and Plagiarisim in School and Career.” Revista Clínica Española (English Edition) 214, no. 7 (October 2014): 410–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rceng.2014.03.002.
Ameen, Elsie C., Daryl M. Guffey, and Jeffrey J. McMillan. “Accounting Students’ Perceptions of Questionable Academic Practices and Factors Affecting Their Propensity to Cheat.” Accounting Education 5, no. 3 (September 1996): 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639289600000020.
Amran, Elsa Fitri, and Fitri Selvia. “Pengaruh Etika Auditor, Pengalaman Auditor Dan Motivasi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris Kantor Akuntan Publik Kota Padang).” Competitive Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan 3, no. 2 (August 17, 2019): 52. https://doi.org/10.31000/c.v3i2.1741.
Billy, Billy, Andrianus Andrianus, Retno Yuliati, and Yang Elvi Adelina. “Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Berdasarkan Perspektif Fraud Diamond.” Ekspansi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, Perbankan dan Akuntansi 11, no. 2 (November 30, 2019): 157–78. https://doi.org/10.35313/ekspansi.v11i2.1346.
Burke, Debra D., and Kenneth J. Sanney. “Applying the Fraud Triangle to Higher Education: Ethical Implications.” Journal of Legal Studies Education 35, no. 1 (December 2018): 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlse.12068.
Caroline, A., & Sugiarti, Y. (2023). Evaluasi pembelajaran daring untuk mengurangi potensi kecurangan akademik: A case study. Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi, 16(1), 1-15.
Christiana, Angela, Alvina Kristiani, and Stevanus Pangestu. “Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. 19, No. 1, Tahun 202” 19, no. 1 (2021).
Dellaportas, Steven. “Conversations with Inmate Accountants: Motivation, Opportunity and the Fraud Triangle.” Accounting Forum 37, no. 1 (March 2013): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.09.003.
Huang, Shaio Yan, Chi-Chen Lin, An-An Chiu, and David C. Yen. “Fraud Detection Using Fraud Triangle Risk Factors.” Information Systems Frontiers 19, no. 6 (December 2017): 1343–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9647-9.
King, Chula, Roger Guyette, and Chris Piotrowski. “Online Exams and Cheating: An Empirical Analysis of Business Students’ Views.” The Journal of Educators Online 6, no. 1 (January 2009). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2009.1.5.
McCabe, Donald L., Linda Klebe Trevino, and Kenneth D. Butterfield. “Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research.” Ethics & Behavior 11, no. 3 (July 2001): 219–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2.
Nursalam, N., Bani, S., & Munirah, M. (2013). Bentuk kecurangan akademik (academic cheating) mahasiswa PGMI fakultas tarbiyah dan keguruan Uin Alauddin Makassar. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 16(2), 127-138.
Pramudyastuti, O. L., Fatimah, A. N., & Wilujeng, D. S. (2020). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi: Investigasi Dimensi Fraud Diamond. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology, 3(2), 147-153.
Research Design ( John W. Cresswell ) Edisi 4
Saldina, Moch Fachry, Ade Sudarma, and Acep Suherman. “Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi Dengan Self Efficacy Sebagai Variabel Moderasi” 5 (2021).
Setiawan, David Firna. “Analisis Kecurangan Akademik Melalui Rubrik Penskoranpada Kajian Masalah Ekonomi.” Promosi (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi) 4, no. 2 (November 30, 2016). https://doi.org/10.24127/ja.v4i2.634.
Universitas Brawijaya, Annisa Fitriana, Zaki Baridwan, and Universitas Brawijaya. “Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi: Dimensi Fraud Triangle.” Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, August 31, 2012. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2012.08.7159.
Muhsin, . Kardoyo, and A Nurkhin. “What Determinants of Academic Fraud Behavior? From Fraud Triangle to Fraud Pentagon Perspective.” KnE Social Sciences 3, no. 10 (October 22, 2018): 154. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3126.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nur Aini Maqfiroh, Anggy Dwi Puspitasari , Elisa Mulyono, Muhammad Fawwaz Ramadhan, Rahmawati Siti Hajar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal. All works are published under the Creative Commons license CC-BY which means that all content is freely available at no charge to the user or his/her Institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, write, improve, and create derivative creation even for other lawful purposes, this license permits anyone to, as long as they cite and license the derivative creation under similar terms
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
