Implementasi Sistem Anti-Fraud dalam Perencanaan dan Realisasi Dana Kelurahan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59086/jak.v3i3.640Keywords:
Sistem anti-fraud, Ddana kelurahan, Fraud Diamond, Partisipasi masyarakatAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami implementasi sistem anti-fraud dalam perencanaan dan realisasi dana kelurahan di salah satu kelurahan di Kota Medan dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Informan terdiri dari enam orang yang dipilih secara purposive, meliputi aparatur kelurahan dan tokoh masyarakat. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi, dan telaah dokumen, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis tematik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik fraud dapat dijelaskan melalui teori Fraud Diamond, dengan empat elemen utama tekanan, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, dan kapabilitas yang saling berkontribusi terhadap penyimpangan dalam pengelolaan dana. Pencegahan fraud memerlukan pendekatan administratif, struktural, kultural, dan partisipatif. Penelitian ini memiliki keterbatasan pada cakupan wilayah dan pendekatan yang digunakan. Implikasi dari temuan ini memperkaya kajian fraud sektor publik dan menjadi dasar perumusan kebijakan pengawasan yang lebih efektif. Rekomendasi mencakup penguatan sistem pengendalian internal, peningkatan integritas aparatur, pengembangan sistem pelaporan dini, serta pelibatan aktif masyarakat. Penelitian lanjutan disarankan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dan cakupan wilayah yang lebih luas guna memperoleh hasil yang lebih general dan terukur.
This study aims to understand the implementation of an anti-fraud system in the planning and realization of village funds in one of the urban villages in Medan City using a descriptive qualitative approach. Six key informants were selected purposively, consisting of village officials and community representatives. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and document reviews, and analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. The findings indicate that fraudulent practices can be explained using the Fraud Diamond theory, in which the four key elements—pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capability—mutually contribute to deviations in fund management. Fraud prevention requires not only administrative measures but also structural, cultural, and participatory approaches. This study is limited in terms of geographical scope and methodological approach. The findings enrich the theoretical discourse on fraud in the public sector and serve as a foundation for formulating more effective fund oversight policies. Recommendations include strengthening internal control systems, enhancing the integrity of village officials, developing a secure whistleblowing system, and encouraging active community participation. Future research is recommended to adopt a quantitative approach and cover a wider area to obtain more generalizable and measurable results.
References
ACFE (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners). (2022). Report to the Nations: 2022 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2022/
Ahmad, H., Albrecht, C., Albrecht, W. S., & Aziz, R. (2021). The ethics of earnings management: Perceptions after Sarbanes-Oxley. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(3), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04514-4
Ahmad, N., Othman, R., & Jusoff, K. (2021). The effectiveness of internal controls in preventing fraud in public sector. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 750–763.
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, C. O. (2012). Fraud Examination (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2019). Fraud Examination (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Allen, R., & Tommasi, D. (2001). Managing Public Expenditure: A Reference Book for Transition Countries. OECD Publishing.
Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Pike, R. (2013). Towards a conceptual model of whistle-blowing intentions among external auditors. British Accounting Review, 45(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2012.12.003
Amudo, A., & Inanga, E. L. (2009). Evaluation of internal control systems: A case study from Uganda. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 27, 124–144.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Cheng, H., Lin, C., & Yao, S. (2021). Internal control, corporate social responsibility, and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 124, 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.040
COSO. (2013). Internal Control—Integrated Framework: Executive Summary. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Diamond, J. (2002). Performance Budgeting: Is Accrual Accounting Required? IMF Working Paper, WP/02/240.
Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M. J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131
Free, C. (2015). Looking through the fraud triangle: A review and call for new directions. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2015-0009
Free, C., & Murphy, P. R. (2015). The ties that bind: The decision to co-offend in fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 18–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12055
Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy. UNU-WIDER Working Paper No. 2012/30.
Grindle, M. S. (1997). Getting Good Government: Capacity Building in the Public Sectors of Developing Countries. Harvard Institute for International Development.
Hammersley, J. S. (2011). A review of the literature on auditor fraud detection. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50003
Ionescu, L. (2020). The Role of Internal Audit in Fraud Prevention: Evidence from the Public Sector. Audit Financiar, 18(1), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.20869/AUDITF/2020/158/006
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kelejan, E., Sumule, L., & Supit, S. (2019). Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Sektor Publik dalam Konteks Kepentingan Politik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 115–123.
Kummer, T.-F., Singh, K., & Best, P. J. (2015). The role of internal audit in fraud prevention and detection: A global view. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(5), 435–465. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2015-1150
Lenz, R., & Hahn, U. (2015). A synthesis of empirical internal audit effectiveness literature pointing to new research opportunities. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2014-1072
Lüder, K. G., & Jones, R. (2003). Reforming Governmental Accounting and Budgeting in Europe. Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft.
Mihret, D. G., & Grant, B. (2017). The role of internal auditing in corporate governance: Qualitative insights from practitioners. Accounting Forum, 41(3), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2017.07.001
Mikesell, J. L. (2014). Fiscal Administration: Analysis and Applications for the Public Sector. Cengage Learning.
Murphy, P. R., & Free, C. (2022). Broadening the fraud triangle: Instrumental climate and fraud. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101, 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101267
Murphy, P. R., & Free, C. (2022). Preventing fraud: Internal auditors and the mediation of organizational pressures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 95, 101274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101274
Nuryatno, M., Soewarno, N., & Tjen, C. (2020). Fraud hexagon: A model of fraud causes. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(4), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0144
OECD. (2016). Budgeting and Public Expenditures in OECD Countries 2016. OECD Publishing.
Omar, N., Johari, Z. A., & Smith, M. (2016). Predicting corporate fraud using financial data. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(S4), 243–248.
Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90040-9
Owusu, G. M. Y., Frimpong, E. A., & Asare, E. T. (2020). Anti-corruption strategies and public sector performance: A developing country perspective. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2019-0038
Owusu, G. M. Y., Frimpong, M. O., & Darko, F. A. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of anti-fraud strategies in public sector organisations. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(2), 489–505.
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Poister, T. H., Pitts, D. W., & Edwards, L. H. (2010). Strategic management research in the public sector: A review, synthesis, and future directions. American Review of Public Administration, 40(5), 522–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010370617
Rajgopal, S., & White, R. M. (2020). Fraud and financial reporting: Literature synthesis and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 45, 100274.
Razaee, Z. (2021). Corporate Governance and Ethics. John Wiley & Sons.
Razaee, Z. (2021). Corporate governance and fraud: Perspectives from the boardroom. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 13(2), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3777616
Robinson, M. (2011). Performance-Based Budgeting. International Monetary Fund.
Ruankaew, T. (2016). Beyond the fraud triangle. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(12), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v11n12p213
Schick, A. (2009). Budgeting for Fiscal Space. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 9(2), 1–24.
Sihombing, K. S., Panggabean, R. M., & Manurung, D. T. H. (2019). The influence of effectiveness of internal control, compliance to accounting rules, and morality of management on the tendency of accounting fraud. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 7(1), 1–13.
Trompeter, G. M., Carpenter, T. D., Desai, N., Jones, K. L., & Riley Jr, R. A. (2014). A synthesis of fraud-related research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(1), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50654
UNDP. (2016). Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating for Development Results. United Nations Development Programme.
Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392857
Wells, J. T. (2017). Corporate Fraud Handbook: Prevention and Detection (5th ed.). Wiley.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
World Bank. (2004). Social Accountability: An Introduction to the Concept and Emerging Practice. Participation and Civic Engagement Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/
World Bank. (2020). Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Washington, DC: World Bank.
Zakaria, M., Ali, N. A., & Tahir, M. H. (2016). Internal control system effectiveness in public sector organizations. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(S4), 153–156.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Edisah Putra Nainggolan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Mandiri Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan
Publisher Lembaga Riset Ilmiah
© 2022
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
