Kontribusi Pembiayaan Murabahah, FDR, NPF, dan NOM terhadap Kinerja Keuangan (ROA) Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia

Authors

  • Dody Salden Chandra Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Edisah Putra Nainggolan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Rahmat Hidayat Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59086/jak.v3i2.638

Keywords:

Pembiayaan Murabahah, FDR, NPF, NOM, ROA, Bank Umum Syariah

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kontribusi pembiayaan Murabahah, Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), NonPerforming Financing (NPF), dan Net Operating Margin (NOM) terhadap kinerja keuangan Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia yang diukur dengan Return on Assets (ROA). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan data sekunder berupa laporan keuangan triwulanan yang diperoleh dari situs resmi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Sampel dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan kriteria Bank Umum Syariah yang secara konsisten menyampaikan data lengkap selama periode observasi. Analisis data dilakukan dengan bantuan software IBM SPSS 25. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara simultan variabel pembiayaan Murabahah, FDR, NPF, dan NOM berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ROA. Secara parsial, pembiayaan Murabahah, FDR, dan NOM berpengaruh positif terhadap ROA, yang mengindikasikan bahwa efisiensi pembiayaan dan operasional mendorong peningkatan profitabilitas. Sementara itu, NPF berpengaruh negatif terhadap ROA, menunjukkan bahwa pembiayaan bermasalah berdampak buruk terhadap kinerja keuangan bank. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya menjaga kualitas pembiayaan dan mengelola margin operasional secara optimal dalam meningkatkan kinerja keuangan bank syariah.

This study aims to examine the contribution of Murabahah financing, Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Non-Performing Financing (NPF), and Net Operating Margin (NOM) to the financial performance of Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia, as measured by Return on Assets (ROA). This research employs a quantitative approach using secondary data derived from quarterly financial reports published on the official website of the Financial Services Authority (OJK). The sample was selected through purposive sampling, focusing on Islamic Commercial Banks that consistently published complete data during the observation period. Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS 25. The results indicate that Murabahah financing, FDR, NPF, and NOM simultaneously affect ROA. Partially, Murabahah financing, FDR, and NOM have a significant positive effect on ROA, suggesting that effective financing and operational efficiency enhance profitability. Conversely, NPF has a significant negative effect on ROA, indicating that higher levels of problematic financing reduce bank performance. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining financing quality and optimizing operational margins to improve financial outcomes in Islamic banking.

 

References

Abdullahi, S. A., & Manzuma-Ndaaba, N. M. (2020). Islamic Banking in Developing Economies: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(2), 205–223.

Ahmed, H. (2011). Product development in Islamic banks. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Ahmed, H., Khan, T., & Tarique, K. M. (2021). Measuring the Efficiency of Islamic Banks: Empirical Evidence from OIC Countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(1), 124–139.

Alqahtani, F., Mayes, D. G., & Brown, K. (2020). Reassessing the Financial Performance of Islamic Banks: A Multilevel Analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 68, 101–215.

Alzoubi, T., & Selamat, M. H. (2020). Islamic Modes of Finance and Bank Performance: The Case of Murabahah. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(3), 477–492.

Ayadi, I., & Boujelbène, Y. (2021). Financial Performance and Efficiency of Islamic Banks: A Comparative Study. Research in International Business and Finance, 55, 101–128.

Bitar, M., Pukthuanthong, K., & Walker, T. (2021). Efficiency in Islamic vs. Conventional Banks: The Role of Capital and Liquidity. Global Finance Journal, 47, 100–529.

Chazi, A., & Syed, L. A. M. (2019). Risk Management Practices in Islamic Banks: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 12(4), 527–546.

Chong, B. S., & Liu, M. H. (2009). Islamic banking: Interest-free or interest-based? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2007.12.003

Chortareas, G., Girardone, C., & Ventouri, A. (2021). Bank Supervision and Operational Efficiency: Evidence from Islamic and Conventional Banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 59(1), 71–95.

Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shariah, Maslahah, and Corporate Social Responsibility. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 24(1), 25–45.

Hamid, M. A. A., Mohd Nor, N. H., & Muda, R. (2021). The impact of liquidity and financing risk on Islamic banks’ performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2020-0295

Hanif, M., & Iqbal, A. (2020). Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Pakistan. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, 11(3), 15–29.

Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2007). Exploring the ethical identity of Islamic banks via communication in annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9272-5

Hassan, M. K., & Bashir, A. H. M. (2003). Determinants of Islamic banking profitability. In 10th ERF Annual Conference, Morocco.

Ibrahim, M. (2020). Financial Inclusion and the Performance of Islamic Banks. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 41(2), 87–110.

Khan, M. A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, A. (2022). Capital Structure and Performance of Islamic Banks. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 102–127.

Khan, M. Y., Ilyas, M., & Farooq, M. (2019). Determinants of Profitability in Islamic and Conventional Banks: Evidence from Emerging Markets. Journal of Islamic Business and Management, 9(2), 277–295.

Latif, R., Malik, Q. A., & Ahmad, I. (2021). Non-Performing Financing and Bank Profitability: Evidence from Islamic Banks. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 191–214.

Noman, A. H. M., Pervin, S., Chowdhury, M. A. F., & Banna, H. (2018). The Effect of Credit Risk on the Performance of Islamic Banks. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(1), 276–288.

Obaidullah, M. (2020). Islamic Financial Services and Risk Management: Issues and Challenges. Journal of Islamic Economic Studies, 28(2), 137–156.

Rashid, A., Yousaf, H., & Khaleequzzaman, M. (2017). Does Islamic Banking Really Strengthen Financial Inclusion? Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 10(4), 597–618.

Samad, A. (2004). Performance of interest-free Islamic banks vis-à-vis interest-based conventional banks of Bahrain. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 12(2), 1–25.

Usman, B., & Tjondro, E. (2018). Financial Performance of Islamic Banks in Indonesia: A Comparative Study. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 6(1), 1–12.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-25

How to Cite

Chandra, D. S., Nainggolan, E. P., & Hidayat, R. (2024). Kontribusi Pembiayaan Murabahah, FDR, NPF, dan NOM terhadap Kinerja Keuangan (ROA) Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. Mandiri : Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 3(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.59086/jak.v3i2.638

Issue

Section

Articles